Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Lanik vs Peter Benjamin Privara Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lanik vs Privara analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Lanik vs Peter Benjamin Privara Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lanik 1 - 1 Privara
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lanik has won 43.16% of points on their second serve, while Privara has won 42.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lanik, in recent form, has won 50.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Privara has won 53.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.37% and 35.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lanik has saved 48.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Privara has saved 49.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lanik has won 49.02% of matches played (W/L 25/ 26), with Privara winning 51.61% (W/L 32/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lanik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Privara has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 28/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Lanik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25), where as Privara has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 30/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Lanik winning 1 times and Privara being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Lanik winning 3 and Privara winning 1. The last match between Lanik and Privara was at the M15 Al Zahra, 01-11-2023, First, Hard with Tomas Lanik getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lanik and Privara have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lanik winning 0 times and Privara 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lanik winning 0, and Privara 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lanik has played against opponents with an average rank of 79.35 while Privara has played against players with an average rank of 157.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lanik has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Privara has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lanik has converted 35.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Privara has converted 45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
886
Rank
886
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
687
Rank
653
High
19
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
54% (84-73)
Career Total W/L
47% (59-66)
17% (2-10)
YTD W/L
57% (16-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tomas Lanik | Peter Benjamin Privara |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 1 |
| Games Won | 25 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:0 | 1:55:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (88/142) | 67% (97/144) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (70/88) | 71% (69/97) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (25/54) | 45% (21/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (54/144) | 33% (47/142) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Tomas Lanik
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 4-4 ret. |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Tomas Lanik
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Lanik | Peter Benjamin Privara |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 17% (2/10) | 57% (16/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 25% (7/21) | 59% (34/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (111/152) | 53% (271/244) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 57% (12/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 79 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 108 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:17:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.92 | 105.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (448/777) | 57% (782/1378) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (264/448) | 67% (527/782) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (142/329) | 42% (252/596) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (25/71) | 45% (72/160) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (295/775) | 42% (590/1400) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 17% (2/10) | 58% (14/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (2/12) | 59% (16/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 40% (5/2) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 60% (5/3) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 8% (12/1) |
Tomas Lanik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noa Vukadin
Player
Tomas Lanik
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tomas Lanik
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Tomas Lanik
60%
(
78 of
131)
1st Serve %
52%
(
65 of
124)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaya Arinc
Player
Tomas Lanik
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Lanik
Player
Gregorio Biondolillo
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Tomas Lanik
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christos Antonopoulos
Player
Tomas Lanik
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Tomas Lanik
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Benjamin Privara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sasa Markovic
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
47%
(
8 of
17)
1st Serve %
43%
(
6 of
14)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
22
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
40%
(
14 of
35)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Michael Geerts
40%
(
19 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
11
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Koki Matsuda
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Hernan Casanova
45%
(
15 of
33)
1st Serve %
81%
(
21 of
26)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
37
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Alex Marti Pujolras
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
12
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lanik Vs Privara Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
